Content engineering for healthcare and regulated industries

Anti-slop AI content, built at scale, signed by humans who know what they're talking about.

We ship the articles, community engagement, and authority-building that actually move AI answers for brands where trust matters. For teams doing it in-house, we also built the review platform that makes it work.

Trusted by MoldCo (environmental health telehealth) and Herasight (reproductive genetics). No credit card to try the platform.

“We don't ask if it's AI.
We ask if it's good.”

The anti-slop discipline: every article clears a named reviewer, a brand-specific rule pack, and an expert byline before it ships.

I spend 20 minutes rewriting every AI draft and then realize I would have been faster doing it myself.

— Content Lead, Series B health-tech

The issue was not 'I need a smarter model.' The issue was 'I need a repeatable process.'

— Agency Founder, 12 clients

Without structural review, every AI output drifts. After 40 drafts you can't tell whose voice it is.

— Brand Manager, Healthcare

Two ways to work with Typescape

We run it for you. Or you run it yourself.

One review system, two entry points. Same rule packs, same reviewers, same export format — whether our team is writing or yours is.

Done for you

Full-stack content engineering

Articles, Reddit and community engagement, comparison pages, case studies, podcast bookings, authority partnerships — all human-reviewed, all signed by named experts. Built for brands where one sloppy article would do real damage.

  • Named clinician / expert bylines
  • Daily community engagement across target subreddits
  • You own everything — no lock-in

3–6 month engagements.
Scoped by outcome.

Request a proposal
Do it yourself

Structured review platform

Turn your reviewers' feedback into rules your AI loads before the next draft is written. The same system that powers our services arm, delivered as a free-to-start SaaS for in-house teams.

  • Unlimited reviewers on every plan
  • CLI, API, and MCP — works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex
  • Free for 15 reviews / month

Free → $249 / month.
No credit card to start.

Start reviewing — free

Real results

Named customers in regulated categories. Specific outcomes.

We work where trust is non-negotiable — healthcare, reproductive genetics, environmental medicine. Anonymous logo walls aren't the vibe.

Environmental health telehealth

MoldCo

“From zero AI visibility to category leadership in 6 weeks.”

Daily Reddit engagement across r/ToxicMoldExposure, r/MCAS, r/cfs. Long-form pillar articles with named clinician bylines.

See u/MoldCo on Reddit

Reproductive genetics

Herasight

“Category-creation content for a polygenic screening company.”

Named-byline articles with geneticist citations. Daily engagement in r/infertility, r/IVF, r/genetics. Content + outreach + paid working together.

See Herasight

Your brand?

Get a custom audit

We run your key queries through ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, map the content and community gaps, and hand you a personalized content engineering plan.

Get your audit — free

The compounding loop

Four steps. Each one feeds the next.

The third review is faster because the system remembers what your reviewer taught it the first two times.

  1. 01

    Submit the draft

    Paste markdown, upload a file, or pull from your repo. One link, and your reviewers can start.

  2. 02

    Anchor the feedback

    Every note stays attached to the passage it fixes — exportable structured findings, not margin notes.

  3. 03

    Feed it back

    Export via CLI, API, or MCP. The next draft starts from real reviewer judgment, not a blank slate.

  4. 04

    Feedback becomes rules

    Promote the recurring note once. The 47th time you give the same feedback is the last time you have to.

Works with Claude Code · Cursor · Codex · VS Code · Amp · any MCP-compatible client. Try it on one draft →

Pricing

Priced per review — not per seat.

SaaS starts free. Services start with a conversation. Unlimited reviewers on every SaaS plan. Full CLI, API, and MCP included.

Free

$0

15 reviews / month

For individuals trying the loop on a real draft.

  • Unlimited reviewers
  • Magic-link sharing
  • JSON export + CLI + MCP + API
Start reviewing
Most popular

Pro

$79 /mo

100 reviews / month

For teams with recurring review workflows.

  • Everything in Free
  • Rule workspace + publishing
  • Revision lineage
  • Repository integrations
Try free for 14 days

Scale

$249 /mo

500 reviews / month

For agencies managing multiple client voices.

  • Everything in Pro
  • 5 rule workspaces
  • Multi-tenant isolation
  • Priority support
Try free for 14 days

Services

Talk

Done-for-you engagement

For healthcare and regulated brands that want us to run it — content, community, authority.

  • Anti-slop articles with named bylines
  • Daily Reddit / community engagement
  • Comparison pages, case studies, calculators
  • SaaS platform included
Request a proposal

Questions teams ask before they commit

How is the services engagement structured?
A 2–3 week diagnostic (audit, positioning, systems blueprint) followed by a 3-month build-and-calibrate phase: 2–5 articles/week, daily Reddit and community engagement, comparison pages, case stories, and light outreach. Month three onward is an optional expand phase with authority partnerships, podcast bookings, and paid amplification layered on top.
Do you only work with healthcare companies?
Healthcare and regulated-adjacent categories are where our approach is strongest — categories where one bad article does real damage and where a named expert byline is the difference between being cited and being skipped. That includes fintech, legal, clinical SaaS, and reproductive / mental / environmental health.
Is the review platform separate from the services work?
Same system, two entry points. The SaaS platform is the review engine we ship every piece of services content through — so teams that want to run it themselves get the same tooling we use internally. Services clients get the platform included; platform customers can step up to services when they want us to run it.
What happens if we stop working together?
You own everything. Articles, comparison pages, calculators, case studies, Reddit accounts, rulepacks — all of it stays with you. No lock-in clauses, no authority assets held hostage. The engagement ends; the compounding continues.
Is this an AI content detector?
The opposite. We don't ask if it's AI. We ask if it's good. Named clinicians sign off, reviewers check against your actual rules, and the platform catches the repeat misses. A compliance officer wouldn't know — and that's the point.
How is the SaaS different from Google Docs comments or Grammarly?
Google Docs comments disappear on resolve. Grammarly enforces preset grammar rules. Typescape captures your reviewers' specific judgment — brand voice, factual accuracy, regulatory framing — and turns the recurring ones into rules your AI loads before the next draft is even written.

Stop shipping the same slop as everyone else.

Start with a free visibility audit, or kick the tires on the review platform. Either way, the next article you publish should be better than the last.