Every review makes the next draft better

You're spending hours reviewing AI‑generated content and giving the same feedback over and over. Typescape turns that feedback into rules your AI loads before it writes — so corrections compound and the third review is faster than the first.

Start reviewing — free See how it works

Free for 15 reviews/month · No credit card · Unlimited reviewers

"I spend 20 minutes rewriting every AI draft and then realize I would have been faster doing it myself."
— Content Ops Lead, Series B SaaS

"The issue was not 'I need a smarter model.' The issue was 'I need a repeatable process.'"
— Agency Founder, 12 clients

"Without structural controls, every AI output drifts a little. After 40 drafts you can't tell whose voice it is."
— Brand Manager, Healthcare

typescape.ai/app/reviews

Comments

Sarah M. 2h ago

The CTA copy here is unclear — "Get started" doesn't tell them what they're starting.

Alex R. 4h ago

Tone feels too casual for this audience. Our voice guide says "confident, not chatty."

Promoted to rule

No passive voice in headlines

Four steps. Each one feeds the next.

The third review is faster because the system remembers what your reviewer taught it.

Submit for review

Paste markdown, upload a file, or pull from your repo. Share a magic link — reviewers open it and start. No account needed.

Get structured feedback

Every comment is anchored to a specific passage and persists as structured data. Not margin notes — findable, exportable findings.

Feed it to your agent

Export as JSON. Feed it via API, CLI, or MCP. The next draft starts from real feedback, not a blank slate.

Feedback becomes rules

Spot a pattern? Promote it to a rule. Future content is checked automatically. The 47th time you give the same note is the last time.

From solo reviews to full governance

Start simple. Add structure when you need it.

Quick review

"I just need someone to review my markdown"

Paste content. Share a link. Get comments. That's it. No repo, no setup, no training.

free magic links

Quality gate

"My AI drafts need a quality check before publishing"

Create a review from your pipeline. Export structured findings. Feed them back to your agent. The loop closes automatically.

CLI export automation

Agency

"I manage multiple clients with different brand voices"

Separate rule workspaces per client. Import voice profiles. Run structured review on AI drafts. Voices don't bleed across accounts.

multi-tenant rules

Compliance

"We need audit-ready review for regulated content"

Install a quality pack. Review against rules. Every finding is immutable and exportable. Compliance-ready for healthcare, finance, legal.

quality packs audit trail

Use it however you work

Terminal, agent, or API — same schema, same export, same rules.

CLI

Create reviews, export findings, manage rules from your terminal. JSON output for scripts and pipelines.

typescape review create --file blog.md
typescape review export --format json

MCP

Model Context Protocol tools for Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP‑compatible agent.

typescape_create_review
typescape_export_findings
typescape_get_rules

REST API

Schema-versioned, idempotent, stable envelopes. The canonical automation surface.

POST /v1/reviews
GET  /v1/reviews/:id/export
GET  /v1/rules?scope=workspace

Works with any agent · Claude Code · Cursor · Codex · VS Code · Amp · any MCP client

Priced per review, not per seat

Unlimited reviewers on every plan. Full CLI, API, and MCP access included.

Free

15 reviews/month

For individuals reviewing AI drafts

Unlimited reviewers
Magic link sharing
JSON export + CLI + MCP + API

Start reviewing

Questions

How is this different from Google Docs comments?

Google Docs comments disappear when resolved. They're unstructured text no machine can act on. Typescape produces structured findings with block-level anchoring that survives edits, machine-readable export, and rules that carry forward. Your agent can consume Typescape output. It cannot consume a Google Docs comment thread.

Do reviewers need accounts?

No. Magic links with one-time email verification. Reviewers click a link and start reviewing. No signup, no install, no training. Under 60 seconds.

Is this an AI content detector?

The opposite. We don't ask if it's AI. We ask if it's good. Quality is about whether content meets your standards, not whether a machine wrote it.

What about Notion, HackMD, or other collaborative editors?

Those are writing tools. Typescape is a review system. Structured feedback, machine-readable export, rules that compound across sessions. They're complementary — write there, review here.

What if I don't use AI to write content?

Typescape works for any markdown content. The compounding loop helps any team that reviews content repeatedly. AI content just makes the problem more acute and the value more obvious.

Can I use this with my existing agent or LLM?

Yes. Typescape is model-agnostic. Bring any agent — Claude, GPT, Llama, Gemini, or any MCP-compatible tool. We provide the review layer. You choose the intelligence.

How is this different from Grammarly or Writer?

They enforce preset rules from an algorithm. Typescape captures your reviewers' actual judgment and makes it reusable. Grammarly catches typos. Typescape catches the organizational blind spots that keep recurring and turns them into rules your AI loads before it writes. Different layer.

Stop losing the feedback that makes your content better

Start with a free review. See why corrections should compound.

Start reviewing — free Request a demo